I can't get over this

AI
1

I asked Claude Opus 4.6 to give me an outline of the Document Automation Workflow. Initially, I only wanted to know the flow from the System to the Licensee, but lo and behold, this is what AI prescribed:

image
image1072×571 19.7 KB

The full document:

InductEase — Document Automation Workflow.zip (217.3 KB)

This is unbelievable, and all inside Wappler. It even makes mention of docx2html, an extension created by @Hyperbytes.

This is the first pass and I (read: AI) will be making a few changes to this flow to meet my expectations.

4 Likes
2

I have the Pro subscription and have realized that while I can use Opus for the planning, Sonnet gets the job done for the coding part. With a decent CLAUDE.md file, Sonnet does just fine building with Wappler, and uses less tokens before a /compact or /clear is needed compared to Opus.

While the new agent teams in 4.6 is great, my bet is you really need a higher tier subscription to make that work well for you. I really liked (for the week it was available), the subagents of Opus 4.5 which used less tokens and easily handled web-development tasks.

1 Like
3

I said something similar here.

The above workflow took, by memory, about 4 tokens using Pro+.

Copilot Chat uses one premium request per user prompt, multiplied by the model's rate. This includes ask, edit, agent, and plan modes in Copilot Chat in an IDE.