Not asking for it. Just curious if you as a team ever gave it a thought and why you decided against it or that it is not the time or else.
I am not talking about the pricing and business model. Although from what I see from the base of users I don’t think your bottom line would suffer too much if you consider that non-technical people still need binaries and support.
That being said the amount of developers from the same base of users that could also contribute to the source code initially is not that big either. But it could get bigger eventually(or never)
We wanted to open source the App Connect and Server Connect frameworks, but just didn’t had time to do it properly. Also we change those currently quite a lot so it’s good to not have much external dependencies yet.
So maybe in the near future when things settle down
Yeah I know. I mean deeper integration. One meaningful for a FOSS approach.
I.e. A new server model that has specific UI controls.
Extensibility is currently not part of a Wappler FOSS approach although I could release my extensions I guess. But that would be me FOSSing and not Wappler.
In summary I don’t know how the community(the world) could benefit from just releasing SC and AC and not the UI. But maybe I am missing something in the whole picture.
Yet again I want to stress that I am not advocating for it. Just trying to understand how you guys would fit the pieces.