Is there a general consensus on whether to use Bootstrap CDN or Bootstrap Local for a new project?
My instinct says Bootstrap Local because then you’ll have everything you need locally hosted and you eliminate an external dependency (potential point of failure), but I notice that a lot of people seem to go with Bootstrap CDN as opposed to Bootstrap Local and I was curious as to why and curious about which of the two options is generally recommended by Wapplers and the Wappler team.
For us we use local if we are making modifications directly to the Bootstrap files themselves, otherwise we’ll go with a CDN. No real reason behind this though aside from what I mentioned …
When adding Bootstrap CDN or Bootstrap Local as a framework, I notice that Wappler also adds Font Awesome and jQuery Slim. Why? Is Bootstrap 4 dependent on Font Awesome and jQuery Slim?
Hi had a bit of a lag yesterday (around 5 seconds) when the page was pulling from the Bootstrap CDN. So decided to run with the files locally hosted going forward
I like to use the bootstrap local, if the site I am creating is for a local restaurant that people globally would have very little interest in.
I use bootstrap CDN when my site has global traffic, as in my thinking a Content Delivery Network is generally going to be faster and more efficient in supplying the user the required files. Most CDNs use multiple servers in various geographic locations which also means your user will probably get the files faster locally or from their ISPs cache server than downloading the files from your local server which could be on the other side of the world for them.