Wappler 7 Beta Focus

Wappler General
21

Any thoughts on Passport JS integration making it in to version 7 @George?

22

That is something @patrick can comment on.

1 Like
23

Hello have you think about improving the final product UI stuff. Like sequential animations, scroll animations, Scoll triggler. etc.??

I know that now there are some available but sometimes comes very basic. Fancy stuff is eye catching for final users.

1 Like
24

Unfortunately GSAP licensing doesnā€™t allow us to integrate an UI for its tools in Wappler.

Iā€™ve been experimenting with GSAP recently and actually itā€™s quite easy to integrate it on your pages with a few lines of code from their examples. So you can already use it.

1 Like
25

I dont mean integrate GSAP specifically. I mean create own Wappler solutions that for sure will be better than GSAP.

26

This would be a lifesaver

27

Many properties are still undocumented and do not contain tool tips. Please improve the documenting of properties within the UI. My suggestion would be to come up with a template for writing each property tool tip. For example:

  1. Do not just repeat the name of the property in the tool tip by saying "this is for..."
  2. Provide a description of the property's purpose.
  3. Provide acceptable values and data types for the property.
  4. Give an example of the most common use case.
  5. Provide a link to where more information can be found from Wappler's documentation.
1 Like
28

Fits nicely along side this feature request

29

Just added my vote. Thank you for sharing.

30

TinyMCE integration is pretty straight forward anyway, without a native Wappler effort. The issue with it is that it's got it's own issues - lots of them. That said, it's a lifetime++ better than Summernote.

1 Like
31

Unfortunately, I didn't reach the same conclusion when attempting to implement it. Many areas were difficult to get work working and were not straightforward.

32

Magic posted they achieved 5m in June and recently announced acheiving 100M token context.

1 Like
33

Wappler has come a long way been reading through some threads and looking things over.

Thats not true, what do you mean? Many have done it ...

  • Pinegrow Interactions
  • Softlite LightMove
  • Semplice
  • Motion Page
  • Spirit App
  • etc., etc.

Thats just a few. :wink:

34

What Iā€™m saying is that GSAPā€™s license doesnā€™t permit us to develop a component with a UI for creating and fine-tuning custom animations without paying an annual licensing fee.

Yes, itā€™s possible, but to comply with GSAPā€™s licensing terms, we would need to pay fees each year. This would mean charging our customers extra for this integration, which we donā€™t want to do at this stage.

4 Likes
35

Thanks for clarifying. Yes, that's more accurate what youā€™re expressing now vs what you stated previously. :+1: