Is Wappler a garage?

Thanks @JonL, that it is very good news for me, although to tell the truth I would like MongoDb to be an official part of Wappler instead of an extension, but I'm not complaining at all :nerd_face:

I imagine it too, and I hope it becomes very popular since a company saves a lot in money and time.

absolutely agree with u.

It's the best way to describe Wappler that I've read so far! :video_game: :grinning:

New libs with working examples are being pushed tomorrow morning.

3 Likes

Oh. Thats good to know.

The post was about being able to bind the db connection with values specific to a server action. So I guess that is the functionality that need work.

I too have connection parameters are bound to results from a SC query. What I do in the UI is have a fixed test DB connection that works. When I need to make adjustments to the query or use a generator/data picker, I switch to that and then switch back to the dynamic one before uploading. It would be great, though, if we could have a dynamic connection step that had fixed static values that were used by the UI for query building and data picking, and separate bound options that were used once uploaded.