Thanks for finding that out @aschoijett!
I guess a work-around would be to de-construct the 3 numbers from the 2010-01-01 format, add one to to middle number and then put it back together again!
Thanks for finding that out @aschoijett!
I guess a work-around would be to de-construct the 3 numbers from the 2010-01-01 format, add one to to middle number and then put it back together again!