I still don't understand what the criteria are for defining when something requested by the community in a vote is included or not in Wappler.
I had already voted here:
I understand that there is a roadmap to be followed, and that the team works hard, and I saw that some requests are met. But I think there could be more transparency in these requests.
For example: when a certain number of votes is reached, the team could at least express itself and include a tag in the vote such as:
"We won't do it", "Impossible to do it", "We are thinking about it", "planned for Wappler V12", that is, at the very least, keep the community informed.
Otherwise, we will end up voting on something meaningless, something that in some cases the team doesn't even say anything about. "Switch case" has been around for over 6 years. Maybe it will come out someday, let's not lose hope.
Well, just one suggestion to improve communication. The answer to the request is important even if it is a "no".